Trade Unions Act, 1926

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019)

/ Judges, Labour Law, Trade Union Dispute, Trade Union Elections, Trade Unions Act, 1926, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Constitution of the Sabha, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trade union’s election process can include stipulations not explicitly mentioned in its constitution. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Trade Union Dispute Case Name: Karbhari and others Vs. Deepak V. Chengede and others Judgment Date: 30 July 2019 Date of the Judgment: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Union Election Based on Constitution: Karbhari vs. Deepak (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Trade Unions to File Insolvency Petitions on Behalf of Workers: JK Jute Mill Mazdoor Morcha vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. (2019)

/ Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 3(23), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(21), Judges, Operational Creditor, R.F. Nariman, Trade Union Registration, Trade Unions Act, 1926, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 13, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 15, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Allows Trade Unions to File Insolvency Petitions on Behalf of Workers (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trade union can be considered an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: JK Jute Mill Mazdoor Morcha vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. Judgment Date: April 30,

Supreme Court Allows Trade Unions to File Insolvency Petitions on Behalf of Workers: JK Jute Mill Mazdoor Morcha vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Union’s Appeal Despite Factual Error: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, Trade Unions Act, 1926, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 22, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 6(e), Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 9A

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Union’s Appeal Despite Factual Error: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trade union can extend its membership to workers who are not employed in the establishment for which the union was originally formed. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: All Escorts Employees Union

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Union’s Appeal Despite Factual Error: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Trade Union Membership: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(c), Judges, Trade Union, Trade Unions Act, 1926, Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 2(g), Trade Unions Act, 1926 with Section 6(e)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trade union can have members who work in different industries or establishments. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 773 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok Bhushan,

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Trade Union Membership: All Escorts Employees Union vs. State of Haryana (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top