Doctrine of lis pendens

Supreme Court rules on Enforceability of Agreements Violating Bangalore Development Authority Rules: G.T. Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju (2022) INSC 512 (18 January 2022)

/ Agreements Void, City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945, City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 with Section 24, City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 with Section 29, Doctrine of lis pendens, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 23, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court on Enforceability of Agreements Violating Bangalore Development Authority Rules Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 512 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can an agreement to sell, which violates the rules of the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), be enforced? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question, examining […]

Supreme Court rules on Enforceability of Agreements Violating Bangalore Development Authority Rules: G.T. Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju (2022) INSC 512 (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Property Transfer in Bangalore Development Authority Cases: G.T. Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju (2022)

/ Doctrine of lis pendens, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 23, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Property Transfer in Bangalore Development Authority Cases: G.T. Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an agreement to sell a property allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), entered into before the expiry of the stipulated non-alienation period, is enforceable. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Specific Performance Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Property Transfer in Bangalore Development Authority Cases: G.T. Girish vs. Y. Subba Raju (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismissing Claim of Bona Fide Purchaser: Siddagangaiah vs. Giriraja Shetty (2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 90, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 92, Doctrine of lis pendens, Execution of Decree, Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 with Section 28, Judges, Maintenance, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 39, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismissing Claim of Bona Fide Purchaser: Siddagangaiah vs. Giriraja Shetty (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit is maintainable to challenge a court auction sale after an application to set aside the sale on grounds of material irregularity has been dismissed. Also, whether a sale during the pendency of a suit

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Dismissing Claim of Bona Fide Purchaser: Siddagangaiah vs. Giriraja Shetty (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top