Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3A, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of land is barred by limitation when the plaintiff’s predecessors did not challenge prior registered sale deeds and court decrees for several decades. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust vs. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle (20 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Suit, Invalidates Sale by Power of Attorney Holder: Umadevi Nambiar vs. Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese (2022) INSC 259

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Ostensible Owner, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 41, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Suit, Invalidates Sale by Power of Attorney Holder Date of the Judgment: April 1, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 259 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a person who holds a general power of attorney sell a property if the document does not explicitly grant them the power to

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Suit, Invalidates Sale by Power of Attorney Holder: Umadevi Nambiar vs. Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese (2022) INSC 259 Read Post »

Specific Performance vs. Adverse Possession: Supreme Court Resolves Land Dispute in Seethakathi Trust Madras vs. Krishna Veni (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 114, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 19(b), Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Decision on Specific Performance and Adverse Possession: Seethakathi Trust Madras vs. Krishna Veni (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance can be enforced against a subsequent bona fide purchaser who was not a party to the original suit. Also, the question of adverse possession on a small portion of land when

Specific Performance vs. Adverse Possession: Supreme Court Resolves Land Dispute in Seethakathi Trust Madras vs. Krishna Veni (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Property Rights: Seethakathi Trust Wins Against Krishna Veni in Land Dispute (17 January 2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 114, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 19(b), Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 3

Supreme Court Upholds Property Rights: Seethakathi Trust Wins Against Krishna Veni in Land Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree of specific performance can be enforced against a bona fide purchaser who was not a party to the original suit. CASE TYPE: Property Law/Civil Case Name: Seethakathi Trust Madras vs. Krishna Veni Judgment Date: 17 January

Supreme Court Upholds Property Rights: Seethakathi Trust Wins Against Krishna Veni in Land Dispute (17 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top