U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, High Court Jurisdiction, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Revisional Powers, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 48

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court rightly interfered with the revisional authority’s order in a land consolidation dispute regarding the determination of paternity and succession rights. CASE TYPE: Land Consolidation Dispute, Civil Law Case Name: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal […]

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Consolidation Order: Sarju Mishra vs. Jangi (2022) INSC 629

/ Civil Law, Hemant Gupta, Inheritance Law, Judges, Land Consolidation, Property Disputes, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 9, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Consolidation Order: Sarju Mishra vs. Jangi (2022) INSC 629 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether consolidation authorities can determine the shares of parties based on the sequence of deaths of family members, when the civil court decree did not specify it. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land Consolidation Case Name: Sarju Mishra (D) Thr. Lrs.

Supreme Court Upholds Land Consolidation Order: Sarju Mishra vs. Jangi (2022) INSC 629 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue Records in Land Dispute: Chandrika vs. Sudama (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Land Law, Property Disputes, Revenue Records, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 9-A(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue Records in Land Dispute: Chandrika vs. Sudama (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the orders of the Revenue Authorities regarding the entry of names in revenue records. CASE TYPE: Civil Land Dispute Case Name: Chandrika (Dead) by LRs. vs. Sudama (Dead) Thr. LRs. & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue Records in Land Dispute: Chandrika vs. Sudama (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Land Consolidation: Hansraj vs. Mewalal (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Judges, K.M. Joseph, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950, U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 with Section 176

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Land Consolidation: Hansraj vs. Mewalal (2019) Date of the Judgment: January 09, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 14 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a co-sharer of land be denied access to a public road during land consolidation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Land Consolidation: Hansraj vs. Mewalal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights of Mahant: Mahant Lalita Sharanji vs. Deoki Devi (2018)

/ Deepak Gupta, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 11-A, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 9(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights of Mahant: Mahant Lalita Sharanji vs. Deoki Devi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can challenge a consolidation order that affects their land rights even if they did not object to the initial order, especially when a subsequent order significantly alters the original allotment. CASE TYPE: Civil (Land Consolidation) Case

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights of Mahant: Mahant Lalita Sharanji vs. Deoki Devi (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top