Terrorist Act

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Counterfeit Currency Case Citing Right to Speedy Trial: Sheikh Javed Iqbal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 489B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 489C, Offences Relating to Counterfeit Currency, Terrorist Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 16, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 43D

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Counterfeit Currency Case Citing Right to Speedy Trial: Sheikh Javed Iqbal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused can be granted bail when the trial is significantly delayed, infringing upon their right to a speedy trial, despite facing serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, […]

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Counterfeit Currency Case Citing Right to Speedy Trial: Sheikh Javed Iqbal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Terror Funding Case: National Investigation Agency vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali (2 April 2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 164, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121A, Judges, Terrorist Act, Unlawful Activities, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 43D

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Terror Funding Case: National Investigation Agency vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in granting bail by re-appreciating the evidence in a case involving offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Terror Financing, Unlawful Activities (Prevention)

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Terror Funding Case: National Investigation Agency vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali (2 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Terrorist Act, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 20-A, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 3(1)

Can a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) stand if the mandatory prior approvals were not properly obtained? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State. The court overturned the convictions, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to legal procedures. This

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top