Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994

Supreme Court Clarifies State’s Discretion on Reservation in Promotions: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16(4), Constitutional Law with Article 16(4A), Fundamental Rights, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 3(7)

Supreme Court Clarifies State’s Discretion on Reservation in Promotions: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) Date of the Judgment: 07 February 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 123 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a state government be compelled to provide reservations in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court Clarifies State’s Discretion on Reservation in Promotions: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, R. Banumathi, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 3(1), Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 4, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 15, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 6

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a revised requisition of vacancies by the government, after the initial advertisement, is valid if it aims to correct a miscalculation and comply with reservation policies. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Anupal Singh and

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top