Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Political Clash Case: Edakkandi Dineshan vs. State of Kerala (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly upheld the conviction of the accused based on the evidence presented, despite claims of contradictions and faulty investigation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Edakkandi Dineshan @ P. Dineshan & Ors. vs. State […]
Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Pay Revision for UP Jal Nigam Employees: Namami Gange & Rural Water Supply Dept. vs. Om Prakash Singh (2025) INSC 40 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the newly formed Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Department is liable to pay the revised pay and retiral benefits to employees of the erstwhile Uttar
Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute through Mediation: Shri Jain Shwetamber Shri Sangh vs. State of Rajasthan (2025) INSC 41 Date of the Judgment: January 6, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 41 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a long-standing property dispute be resolved amicably through mediation? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this
Supreme Court defers decision on Hyderabad Cricket Association Constitution: Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. Charminar Cricket Club (2025) INSC 23 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the recommendations of a Single Member Committee regarding the constitution of the Hyderabad Cricket Association should be approved. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: M/s The Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. M/s Charminar Cricket Club
Supreme Court Clarifies Notice of Award Under Arbitration Act: Krishna Devi vs. Union of India (2025) INSC 24 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the time for filing an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 commences when a party receives formal notice of the award, or from the date the party is aware of the
Supreme Court Upholds Resolution Plan, Limits High Court Interference in Insolvency Cases (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Article 226 of the Constitution. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Mohammed Enterprises (Tanzania) Ltd. vs. Farooq Ali Khan & Ors. Judgment Date: January 03, 2025 Date
Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution in arbitration matters. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment
Supreme Court Summons Additional Accused Based on Witness Testimony: Omi @ Omkar Rathore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Can a trial court summon individuals as additional accused based on witness testimony during trial, even if they were not initially charge-sheeted by the police? CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Omi @ Omkar
Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Absorbed Employees in Inter-Departmental Transfers: Geetha V.M. & Ors. vs. Rethnasenan K. & Ors. (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees absorbed into a new department following a government policy decision retain their original seniority or are treated as new recruits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Geetha V.M. & Ors. vs.
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Stamp Duty Valuation Date of the Judgment: 3rd January, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 1 Judges: J.B. Pardiwala, J. and R. Mahadevan, J. Can a registering officer refer a property for valuation without providing reasons for believing that it is undervalued? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this
Date of the Judgment: January 2, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 34 Judges: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan Can company directors be held liable for environmental offenses committed by their company? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, clarifying the scope of vicarious liability under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900. The
Date of the Judgment: 02 January 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 4 Judges: B. V. Nagarathna J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh J. Can a criminal case be initiated without following the mandatory legal procedures? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question in a case concerning charges under Sections 353 and 186 of the Indian
