Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 May 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 669 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. When a property developer fails to provide essential documents and violates court orders by alienating the originally allotted property, how should the dues be calculated when an alternate property is offered? The Supreme Court of […]
Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 662 Judges: Surya Kant, J. and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can an individual accused of facilitating narcotics smuggling be denied bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) even without direct evidence of possessing contraband? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in the case
Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Do employees of cooperative societies, after being absorbed into the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB), qualify for pension benefits? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Vijay Kumar Joshi vs. Akash Tripathi.
“`html Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 673 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Justice K. Vinod Chandran Can a motor accident victim, rendered bedridden due to the negligence of their employer’s driver, receive enhanced compensation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, where a young man was
Date of the Judgment: 13 May 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 668 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can a company with a large market share be penalized simply for being successful? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. The court clarified the
Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 676 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Justice K. Vinod Chandran In a significant ruling concerning securities fraud, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether funds withheld by a stock exchange should be released to a party under investigation. The case arose from
Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 674 Judges: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., K. Vinod Chandran, J. Can a person be convicted for assisting another in accumulating wealth disproportionate to their known income, even if that person is not a public servant? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the
Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 667 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J., S.V.N. Bhatti, J. Is the current system for designating Senior Advocates in India fair and effective? The Supreme Court of India addressed concerns about the existing process in Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT
Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 May 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 671 Judges: B. V. Nagarathna, J., Satish Chandra Sharma, J. Are vague allegations sufficient to convict someone under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in the case of Rajesh Chaddha vs. State
LEGAL ISSUE: Arbitrability of disputes involving trademark rights arising from contractual agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Trademark Law. Case Name: K. Mangayarkarasi & Anr. vs. N.J. Sundaresan & Anr. [Judgment Date]: May 9, 2025 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 9, 2025 The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the question of whether a dispute
“`html Date of the Judgment: May 09, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 678 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Augustine George Masih, J. Can a government official, found guilty of contempt of court for demolishing homes despite court orders, have their sentence modified to protect their family’s livelihood? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the
Date of the Judgment: May 09, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 655 Judges: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Did the prosecution adequately prove that a public servant demanded and accepted a bribe? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a recent appeal, focusing on inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the overall reliability
