Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Satish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020)

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Satish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt in a case based on circumstantial evidence, particularly concerning the recovery of a dead body and a weapon based on disclosure statements. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case […]

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Satish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Against State in Land Acquisition Case: D.B. Basnett vs. The Collector (2020) INSC 178 (2 March 2020)

Supreme Court Rules Against State in Land Acquisition Case Date of the Judgment: 2 March 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 178 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a state government claim ownership of land without following due process of law and providing fair compensation? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical

Supreme Court Rules Against State in Land Acquisition Case: D.B. Basnett vs. The Collector (2020) INSC 178 (2 March 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court: Co-accused has no right to be heard in further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC (2 March 2020)

Supreme Court: Co-accused has no right to be heard in further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a co-accused has the right to be heard in proceedings for further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah v. State of

Supreme Court: Co-accused has no right to be heard in further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC (2 March 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles liability for lost Indira Vikas Patras in Post Office: Superintendent of Post Office vs. Jambu Kumar Jain (2020)

Supreme Court on Lost Indira Vikas Patras: Post Office Not Liable LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Post Office is liable to pay the maturity value of lost Indira Vikas Patras (IVPs) when the original purchaser’s identity is not recorded. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: The Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Bolangir, Odisha vs. Jambu

Supreme Court settles liability for lost Indira Vikas Patras in Post Office: Superintendent of Post Office vs. Jambu Kumar Jain (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Consent Decree Execution in Family Dispute: Pawan Kumar Arya vs. Ravi Kumar Arya (2020)

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Consent Decree Execution in Family Dispute: Pawan Kumar Arya vs. Ravi Kumar Arya (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a part of a consent decree, specifically the allotment of properties, can be executed independently when the decree also mandates a further supplementary agreement between the parties. CASE TYPE: Civil, Family

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Consent Decree Execution in Family Dispute: Pawan Kumar Arya vs. Ravi Kumar Arya (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Mandates Pension for SBI Employees with 15 Years Service Under VRS 2000 Scheme: Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Radhey Shyam Pandey (2 March 2020)

Date of the Judgment: 2 March 2020 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice Arun Mishra, Justice M.R. Shah, and Justice B.R. Gavai Can a public sector bank deny pension benefits to employees who opted for voluntary retirement after completing 15 years of service, as per

Supreme Court Mandates Pension for SBI Employees with 15 Years Service Under VRS 2000 Scheme: Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Radhey Shyam Pandey (2 March 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Remand in Property Dispute: Jose vs. Johnson (2020)

Supreme Court Restores Remand in Property Dispute: Jose vs. Johnson (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for a bare injunction requires the court to only consider possession or also the title of the property when the right to the property is challenged. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Jose vs. Johnson Judgment Date: 02 March 2020

Supreme Court Restores Remand in Property Dispute: Jose vs. Johnson (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Damage Suit: Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bhavesha Suresh Goradia (2020)

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Damage Suit: Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bhavesha Suresh Goradia (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an ex-parte decree passed against a defendant should be set aside to allow them to contest the suit on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Damage) Case Name: Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs.

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Damage Suit: Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bhavesha Suresh Goradia (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of Abetment to Suicide FIR Based on Settlement: Daxaben vs. State of Gujarat (2022)

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of Abetment to Suicide FIR Based on Settlement: Daxaben vs. State of Gujarat (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can quash an FIR for abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, based on a settlement between the accused and the complainant. CASE TYPE: Criminal

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of Abetment to Suicide FIR Based on Settlement: Daxaben vs. State of Gujarat (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court annuls marriage using Article 142 in settlement: Kirti Vijayvargiya vs. Rahul Vijayvargiya (28 February 2020)

Supreme Court Annuls Marriage Under Article 142 in Settlement: Kirti Vijayvargiya vs. Rahul Vijayvargiya (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can annul a marriage in exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, when the parties have settled their disputes amicably. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Transfer Petition Case Name: Kirti

Supreme Court annuls marriage using Article 142 in settlement: Kirti Vijayvargiya vs. Rahul Vijayvargiya (28 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies bank’s right to deduct processing fees: Bank of India vs. Brindavan Agro Industries (28 February 2020)

Supreme Court on Bank Charges: Bank of India vs. Brindavan Agro Industries (2020) Date of the Judgment: 28 February 2020 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1720 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 2007 of 2019) Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a bank deduct processing fees before a loan is sanctioned?

Supreme Court clarifies bank’s right to deduct processing fees: Bank of India vs. Brindavan Agro Industries (28 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Joint Trial in Cheque Dishonour and Forgery Case: Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel vs. State of Gujarat (28 February 2020)

Supreme Court Directs Joint Trial in Cheque Dishonour and Forgery Case: Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal case of forgery should be tried together with a case of cheque dishonour, when both arise from the same cheque. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Shri Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel &

Supreme Court Directs Joint Trial in Cheque Dishonour and Forgery Case: Pareshbhai Amrutlal Patel vs. State of Gujarat (28 February 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top