Supreme Court clarifies State’s responsibility for retiral benefits in aided institutions: Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith vs. Government of Gujarat (2024) INSC 935 (02 December 2024)

/ Pension Law, Pension Law with Gratuity, Pension Schemes, Retiral Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Reinstatement

Supreme Court Clarifies State’s Responsibility for Retiral Benefits in Aided Institutions Date of the Judgment: 02 December 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 935 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J. and Rajesh Bindal, J. Who is responsible for paying the retirement benefits of employees in grant-in-aid institutions? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, clarifying the obligations […]

Supreme Court clarifies State’s responsibility for retiral benefits in aided institutions: Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith vs. Government of Gujarat (2024) INSC 935 (02 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Appellate Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Date of the Judgment: December 2, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 956 Judges: B.V. Nagarathna, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can a court set aside a trial court’s decree based solely on an amended written statement without further evidence? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ramkumar Choudhary (2024)

/ Civil Procedure Code, Condonation of Delay, Delay in Filing Appeal, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ramkumar Choudhary (2024) Date of the Judgment: November 29, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 932 Judges: J. B. Pardiwala, J., R. Mahadevan, J. Can a state government’s appeal be dismissed due to significant delays in filing? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Dismisses Madhya Pradesh’s Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ramkumar Choudhary (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Experience Marks, Outsourced Employees, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether outsourced employees are eligible for experience marks in direct recruitment. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 29 November 2024 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction for abetment of suicide in broken relationship case: Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 908 (29 November 2024)

/ Abetment of Suicide, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 107, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Mens Rea

Supreme Court overturns conviction for abetment of suicide in broken relationship case: Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 908 (29 November 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a refusal to marry constitutes abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi vs.

Supreme Court overturns conviction for abetment of suicide in broken relationship case: Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 908 (29 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation near Mathura Refinery: Anek Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) INSC 915 (28 November 2024)

/ Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation Near Mathura Refinery LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Anek Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment Date: 28 November 2024 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 915 Judges: Hon’ble

Supreme Court enhances land compensation near Mathura Refinery: Anek Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) INSC 915 (28 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes NGT Order on No-Development Zone in Jabalpur: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024)

/ Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Law, Judicial Review, National Green Tribunal (NGT), National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 14, No-Development Zone

Supreme Court Quashes NGT Order on No-Development Zone in Jabalpur: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) can declare an area as a no-development zone based solely on a Court Commissioner’s report without independent consideration of the objections raised by the parties. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law. Case Name:

Supreme Court Quashes NGT Order on No-Development Zone in Jabalpur: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes NGT order on no-development zone near Gokulpur Talab: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024) INSC 931 (28 November 2024)

/ Due Process, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Law, Environmental Law with National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Independent Assessment, National Green Tribunal, Procedure Law, Tribunal Procedure

Supreme Court quashes NGT order on no-development zone near Gokulpur Talab: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024) INSC 931 (28 November 2024) Date of the Judgment: 28 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 931 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can a tribunal base its decision solely on a report from a court-appointed commissioner, without

Supreme Court quashes NGT order on no-development zone near Gokulpur Talab: S.N. Dubey vs. Raman Khandelwal (2024) INSC 931 (28 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Suresh Chandra Tiwari vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024) INSC 907 (28 November 2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Suresh Chandra Tiwari vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024) INSC 907 (28 November 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution’s circumstantial evidence was strong enough to convict the accused of murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Suresh Chandra Tiwari & Anr. vs. State of

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence: Suresh Chandra Tiwari vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024) INSC 907 (28 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Specific Performance: R. Shama Naik vs. G. Srinivasiah (2024)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Readiness and Willingness, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16(c)

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Specific Performance: R. Shama Naik vs. G. Srinivasiah (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff demonstrated readiness and willingness to perform their part of a contract for specific performance. CASE TYPE: Specific Performance of Contract. Case Name: R. Shama Naik vs. G. Srinivasiah. [Judgment Date]: 28 November 2024. Introduction

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Specific Performance: R. Shama Naik vs. G. Srinivasiah (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Fundamental Rights, Promotion, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 54(1)(a), West Bengal Service Rules

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is entitled to notional financial benefits of a promotional post after retirement when the promotion was recommended before retirement but not actually granted due to administrative delays. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Government

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes NGT order imposing penalty without proper assessment: Benzo Chem Industrial vs. Arvind Manohar Mahajan (2024)

/ Environmental Compliance, Environmental Law, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 15, Penalty Assessment, Principles of Natural Justice

Supreme Court quashes NGT order imposing penalty without proper assessment: Benzo Chem Industrial vs. Arvind Manohar Mahajan (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) can impose a penalty for environmental damage without proper assessment and in violation of the principles of natural justice. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law Case Name: Benzo Chem Industrial Private

Supreme Court quashes NGT order imposing penalty without proper assessment: Benzo Chem Industrial vs. Arvind Manohar Mahajan (2024) Read Post »

Scroll to Top