Supreme Court Upholds Probe into Uber’s Predatory Pricing: Competition Law Case (3 September 2019)

Uber’s Predatory Pricing Practices: Supreme Court Upholds CCI Probe in Competition Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Uber abused its dominant position by engaging in predatory pricing, violating Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. CASE TYPE: Competition Law Case Name: Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs. Competition Commission of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 3 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Probe into Uber’s Predatory Pricing: Competition Law Case (3 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Deadly Court Attack Case: Manjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Deadly Court Attack Case: Manjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were part of an unlawful assembly and liable for the death of a person during a court attack. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Manjit Singh vs. The State of Punjab [Judgment Date]: 3rd September

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Deadly Court Attack Case: Manjit Singh vs. State of Punjab (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Specific Endowment” under Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Act: M.J. Thulasiraman vs. Commissioner (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Endowment” under Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Act: M.J. Thulasiraman vs. Commissioner (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “specific endowment” under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. CASE TYPE: Religious and Charitable Endowments Law Case Name: M.J. Thulasiraman and Another vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Administration

Supreme Court clarifies “Specific Endowment” under Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Act: M.J. Thulasiraman vs. Commissioner (2019) Read Post »

Limitation for Arbitration Claims: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Geo Miller & Co. Case (03 September 2019)

Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.: Supreme Court on Limitation in Arbitration LEGAL ISSUE: Whether arbitration claims are barred by limitation based on the date the cause of action arose or the date of dispute. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs.

Limitation for Arbitration Claims: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Geo Miller & Co. Case (03 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Umesh Tukaram Padwal vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Umesh Tukaram Padwal vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Date of the Judgment: September 3, 2019 Citation: Umesh Tukaram Padwal & Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra (2019) INSC 793 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., Ajay Rastogi, J. Can

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Umesh Tukaram Padwal vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Vijay Nathalal Gohil vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Vijay Nathalal Gohil vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code can be upheld solely based on circumstantial evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Vijay Nathalal Gohil vs. State of Maharashtra Judgment Date: 3

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Vijay Nathalal Gohil vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation period for IBC applications: Vashdeo R Bhojwani vs. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd (2019)

Supreme Court on Limitation for IBC Applications: Vashdeo R Bhojwani vs. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Limitation Act to applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Vashdeo R Bhojwani vs. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd & Anr. Judgment Date: 02

Supreme Court clarifies limitation period for IBC applications: Vashdeo R Bhojwani vs. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Autonomy of JBIMS for 2019-20 Admissions: Rohan Virani vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Autonomy of JBIMS for 2019-20 Admissions: Rohan Virani vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of Management Studies (JBIMS) should be considered an autonomous or non-autonomous department of the University of Mumbai for the 2019-2020 academic year, impacting admission criteria. CASE TYPE: Education Law, specifically concerning admissions to

Supreme Court Upholds Autonomy of JBIMS for 2019-20 Admissions: Rohan Virani vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Work-Charged Service Counts Towards Pension in Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court Rules Work-Charged Service Counts Towards Pension LEGAL ISSUE: Whether work-charged service should be counted as qualifying service for pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Prem Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 2nd September 2019 Date of the Judgment: 2nd September 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 851 Judges: Arun

Supreme Court Rules Work-Charged Service Counts Towards Pension in Uttar Pradesh Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Parking Policy to Ease Congestion: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 785 (2 September 2019)

Supreme Court Issues Directions on Parking Policy in Residential Areas LEGAL ISSUE: Implementation of a comprehensive parking policy in residential and other areas. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 2 September 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 2 September 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 785

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Parking Policy to Ease Congestion: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 785 (2 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies medical discharge procedure for army personnel: Ram Khilawan vs. Union of India (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Medical Discharge Procedures in Army Service: Ram Khilawan vs. Union of India (2019) Date of the Judgment: September 2, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 861 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Hemant Gupta, J. Can an army personnel be discharged from service due to medical reasons without a proper evaluation by an Invalidating Medical

Supreme Court clarifies medical discharge procedure for army personnel: Ram Khilawan vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Army Personnel with Multiple Red Ink Entries: Sep. Satgur Singh vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Army Personnel with Multiple Red Ink Entries: Sep. Satgur Singh vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an army personnel can be discharged for having multiple red ink entries in his service record. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sep. Satgur Singh vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Army Personnel with Multiple Red Ink Entries: Sep. Satgur Singh vs. Union of India Read Post »

Scroll to Top