Supreme Court Grants Litigation Expenses to Reinstated Constables: Deepak Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement of back wages and continuity of service for police constables whose termination was deemed illegal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Deepak Kumar & Ors. vs. Principal Secretary Home, Govt. of U.P Lucknow (U.P) & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 904 […]

Supreme Court Grants Litigation Expenses to Reinstated Constables: Deepak Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Entry Tax on Imported Goods: State of Kerala vs. Fr. William Fernandez (2017)

Can states levy entry tax on goods imported from outside India? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a batch of appeals, including State of Kerala vs. Fr. William Fernandez. This judgment clarifies the legislative powers of states regarding entry tax on imported goods. The court held that states have the authority

Supreme Court Upholds Entry Tax on Imported Goods: State of Kerala vs. Fr. William Fernandez (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017)

Can a prior agreement to sell property be nullified by a subsequent sale? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a dispute over a house sale agreement. The Court examined the validity of competing agreements and the readiness of the parties to fulfill their obligations. This case highlights the importance

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court restores acquittal in bond theft case: Rajesh Kumar C.K. Jain vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

Can a conviction be overturned if the prosecution fails to establish key facts? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving the alleged theft of a bond paper from a government office. The core issue revolved around whether the High Court of Karnataka correctly overturned the acquittal granted by the

Supreme Court restores acquittal in bond theft case: Rajesh Kumar C.K. Jain vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Mandates Depreciation Deduction Under Section 80-IA of Income Tax Act: Plastiblends India Ltd. vs. ACIT (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 9, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 824 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. Can businesses choose to ignore depreciation when calculating deductions under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question, clarifying that depreciation must be considered when computing profits eligible for

Supreme Court Mandates Depreciation Deduction Under Section 80-IA of Income Tax Act: Plastiblends India Ltd. vs. ACIT (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Panama Papers Investigation: Manohar Lal Sharma vs. CBI (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the existing Special Investigation Team (SIT) is sufficient to investigate the Panama Papers revelations. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Criminal) Case Name: Manohar Lal Sharma vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. Judgment Date: October 9, 2017 Date of the Judgment: October 9, 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Adarsh Kumar

Supreme Court Addresses Panama Papers Investigation: Manohar Lal Sharma vs. CBI (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overrules Restrictions on Videoconferencing in Matrimonial Disputes: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh (2017) INSC 847 (9 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether videoconferencing can be used in matrimonial disputes under the Family Courts Act, 1984. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law. Case Name: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh. Judgment Date: 9 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 9 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 847 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J. (Majority Opinion), Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud,

Supreme Court Overrules Restrictions on Videoconferencing in Matrimonial Disputes: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh (2017) INSC 847 (9 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to Expedite Hearing in Service Matter: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure vs. Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende (2017)

Can the Supreme Court intervene when a High Court delays hearing a case despite prior directions? The Supreme Court of India addressed this in a service matter concerning the appointment of the Director of Town Planning in Maharashtra. The Court directed the High Court to expedite the hearing of the pending writ petitions. This case,

Supreme Court directs High Court to Expedite Hearing in Service Matter: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure vs. Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Birbal Choudhary vs. State of Bihar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were rightly convicted for kidnapping for ransom under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Kidnapping, Dacoity Case Name: Birbal Choudhary @ Mukhiya Jee vs. State of Bihar [Judgment Date]: October 6, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 6, 2017 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Birbal Choudhary vs. State of Bihar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeals Based on Prior Judgment: Delhi Development Authority vs. J.B.M. Builder Pvt. Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of prior judgment in similar cases CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. M/S. J.B.M. Builder Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 06 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 06 October 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J., and Amitava Roy, J. Can a

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeals Based on Prior Judgment: Delhi Development Authority vs. J.B.M. Builder Pvt. Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Lack of Ownership and Authority: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (2017) INSC 839

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for specific performance of a contract can be decreed when the defendants deny ownership of the property and the authority of the alleged power of attorney holder. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance of Contract Case Name: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Lack of Ownership and Authority: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (2017) INSC 839 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Attachment of Properties in Fodder Scam Cases Despite Accused’s Death: Ravi Sinha & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 5, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 870 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can the attachment of properties under the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944, continue after the death of the primary accused? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a series of appeals related to

Supreme Court Upholds Attachment of Properties in Fodder Scam Cases Despite Accused’s Death: Ravi Sinha & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top