Supreme Court directs challenge to Chief Secretary Report in Forest Land Identification: Viswajeet Khanna vs Sukhwinder Singh (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a report submitted by the Chief Secretary regarding the identification of forest lands can be challenged before the High Court in an appropriate proceeding. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court and Land Law. Case Name: Viswajeet Khanna and Ors. vs. Sukhwinder Singh and Ors. [Judgment Date]: October 05, 2017 Introduction Date of the […]

Supreme Court directs challenge to Chief Secretary Report in Forest Land Identification: Viswajeet Khanna vs Sukhwinder Singh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insurance Claim Dispute: Anu Texchem Products vs. New India Assurance (2017)

Can a court reconsider its own judgment? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question when M/s Anu Texchem Products (P) Ltd sought a review of a previous order. This case involves a dispute over an insurance claim. The Supreme Court, composed of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, ultimately dismissed the

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insurance Claim Dispute: Anu Texchem Products vs. New India Assurance (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) concerning the calculation of energy charges, specifically regarding the cost of coal. CASE TYPE: Contractual Dispute/Electricity Law. Case Name: Nabha Power Limited (NPL) vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) & Anr. Judgment Date: 05 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 05 October 2017 Citation: 2017

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Delhi Tax Amnesty Scheme: Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of Designated Authority in Tax Dispute

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Additional Commissioner, as the designated authority, had the power to issue a show cause notice under Clause 8 of the Delhi Tax Compliance Achievement Scheme, 2013. CASE TYPE: Tax Law, specifically concerning the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Case Name: Commissioner of Trade and Taxes and Ors. vs. M/S Ahluwalia

Delhi Tax Amnesty Scheme: Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of Designated Authority in Tax Dispute Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Probation to First-Time Offenders Under Essential Commodities Act: Dhurukumar vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) INSC 804 (4 October 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 4 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 804 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can first-time offenders convicted under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 be granted probation instead of imprisonment? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, focusing on whether the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act,

Supreme Court Grants Probation to First-Time Offenders Under Essential Commodities Act: Dhurukumar vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) INSC 804 (4 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Attempt to Murder Conviction to Simple Hurt: Shyam Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 873 Judges: Justice R.K. Agrawal and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer Can a conviction for attempt to murder be reduced to simple hurt if the injury is not on a vital part of the body and there was no pre-meditation? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Reduces Attempt to Murder Conviction to Simple Hurt: Shyam Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Despite Delay in Intimation: Om Prakash vs. Reliance General Insurance (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance claim can be rejected solely based on a delay in intimation, despite the claim being genuine. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Om Prakash vs. Reliance General Insurance and Anr. [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2017 Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 888 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Despite Delay in Intimation: Om Prakash vs. Reliance General Insurance (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on promotion: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a punishment imposed on an employee before the check period for promotion, but continuing into the check period, can be considered for denying promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali and Ors. [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2017 Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2017 Citation: Not

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on promotion: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds FIR in Land Fraud Case: Parbatbhai Ahir vs. State of Gujarat (2017)

Can a settlement between parties nullify serious criminal charges like forgery and extortion? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in Parbatbhai Ahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. v. State of Gujarat and Anr. This case highlights the limits of quashing criminal proceedings, especially when they involve significant societal implications beyond a

Supreme Court Upholds FIR in Land Fraud Case: Parbatbhai Ahir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tax Implications of Unregistered Joint Development Agreements: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini (2017) INSC 859 (04 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an unregistered Joint Development Agreement (JDA) constitutes a “transfer” under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, making it liable for capital gains tax. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini [Judgment Date]: 04 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 04 October

Supreme Court Clarifies Tax Implications of Unregistered Joint Development Agreements: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Balbir Singh Maini (2017) INSC 859 (04 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 319 CrPC in summoning additional accused: S. Mohammed Ispahani vs. Yogendra Chandak (2017)

October 4, 2017 LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal question is about the circumstances under which a court can summon additional individuals as accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), particularly when those individuals were named in the First Information Report (FIR) but not in the charge sheet. CASE TYPE: This case

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 319 CrPC in summoning additional accused: S. Mohammed Ispahani vs. Yogendra Chandak (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Claim on Kokapet Lands: KSB Ali vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 907 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a government be compelled to recognize claims to land based on historical grants, even when those claims are not clearly established? The Supreme Court of India addressed this complex question in a recent case involving

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Claim on Kokapet Lands: KSB Ali vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top