Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of rightful possession of land in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma and Others Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 756 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can mere entries in […]

Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Regulates Firework Sales to Curb Pollution in Delhi NCR: Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (12 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Balancing the right to a clean environment and the regulation of firework sales during festivals. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation concerning environmental pollution. Case Name: Arjun Gopal & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: I.A. No. 52448 of 2017

Supreme Court Regulates Firework Sales to Curb Pollution in Delhi NCR: Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (12 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Absorption of Staff in Aided College Conversion Case: Ayurved Vikas Mandal vs. State of Gujarat (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government is obligated to absorb the staff of an aided college when it is converted to a self-financing institution. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ayurved Vikas Mandal vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 12, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 12, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC

Supreme Court Directs Absorption of Staff in Aided College Conversion Case: Ayurved Vikas Mandal vs. State of Gujarat (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142: X vs. Y (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, bypassing the usual procedures under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: X vs. Y Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142: X vs. Y (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clause: Aravali Power Company vs. Era Infra Engineering (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee of a party to a contract can act as an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the contract, before the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Aravali Power Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/S. Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Judgment Date: 12

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clause: Aravali Power Company vs. Era Infra Engineering (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Relaxes Six-Month Waiting Period for Divorce by Mutual Consent: Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur (2017) INSC 777 (12 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the six-month minimum waiting period for a second motion in divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is mandatory or can be relaxed in exceptional cases. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Divorce Case Name: Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Introduction Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court Relaxes Six-Month Waiting Period for Divorce by Mutual Consent: Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur (2017) INSC 777 (12 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows fresh inspection for Medical College: Madha Medical College vs. Union of India (2017)

Can a medical college be subjected to multiple inspections by the Medical Council of India (MCI)? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving Madha Medical College. The court allowed a fresh inspection, emphasizing the MCI’s role in maintaining standards in medical education. This case highlights the importance of infrastructure and faculty in

Supreme Court allows fresh inspection for Medical College: Madha Medical College vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Inspection for Medical College: Major S D Singh Medical College vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Union government’s decision to prohibit a medical college from admitting students due to deficiencies was justified. CASE TYPE: Education Law, specifically concerning medical education. Case Name: Major S D Singh Medical College and Hospital & Anr. vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Can a medical college

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Inspection for Medical College: Major S D Singh Medical College vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Debarment of Medical College for Deficiencies: Royal Medical Trust vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a medical college can be debarred from admitting students for failing to meet the required standards and for non-compliance with the conditions set by the Oversight Committee. CASE TYPE: Medical Education Law Case Name: Royal Medical Trust and Another vs. Union of India and Another Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Debarment of Medical College for Deficiencies: Royal Medical Trust vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the dismissal of an employee for issuing receipts without receiving payment is justified. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. Judgment Date: 11 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 11 September 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 788 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation Despite Lower Claim: Narendra & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017)

Can a court award compensation higher than what was claimed by a landowner in land acquisition cases? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case. The Court ruled that it can award fair compensation based on the true market value, regardless of the initial claim. This decision ensures that landowners receive

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation Despite Lower Claim: Narendra & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies parole eligibility for TADA convicts: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) INSC 774

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) is a sufficient ground to deny parole. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Parole. Case Name: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. Judgment Date: September 11, 2017. Introduction Can a person convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA)

Supreme Court clarifies parole eligibility for TADA convicts: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) INSC 774 Read Post »

Scroll to Top