Can persistent eve-teasing and harassment lead to a conviction for abetment of suicide? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in the case of Pawan Kumar vs. State of H.P.. The court examined whether the accused’s actions created a situation that left the victim with no option but to end her life. […]
Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 410 Judges: Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Can a state government force a medical college, which is a part of a private university, to get affiliation from another state university? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question regarding the autonomy of
Can a land owner develop a reserved land if the authorities fail to acquire it within a stipulated time? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Satellite Developers and the State of Maharashtra. The core issue revolved around the acquisition of land reserved for public purposes under the Maharashtra Regional and Town
Can a land acquisition nullify the forfeiture of earnest money in a prior agreement to sell? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, clarifying the interplay between land acquisition proceedings and private contracts. This judgment highlights the importance of civil suits in resolving contractual disputes, especially when land is acquired
Can a document titled “Conditional Sale” be considered a mortgage? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a property dispute from Karnataka. This case examines the fine line between a conditional sale and a mortgage, impacting property rights. The judgment was delivered by Justices R.K. Agrawal and Abhay Manohar Sapre. Justice Abhay
Can the testimony of eyewitnesses be partially accepted in a criminal case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder. The Court upheld the conviction of two accused persons while acquitting the third. This judgment highlights the importance of corroborative evidence in criminal cases. The bench comprised Justices
Can a contract be formed if there is a proposal and a counter-proposal? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a dispute over a supply agreement. This case clarifies the essential elements required for a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Court ultimately ruled that no contract
Can proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be closed if the accused is willing to pay the cheque amount? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning cheque dishonor. The court clarified the procedure, emphasizing the compensatory nature of the law and the possibility of closing proceedings
The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical issue regarding the demolition of the Babri Masjid. The Court has ordered a joint trial for all accused. This decision aims to consolidate proceedings and ensure a comprehensive resolution. This judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice R.F. Nariman. Justice
Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Supreme Court Orders Joint Trial (19 April 2017) Read Post »
Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 398 Judges: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J., R.F. Nariman, J. Can a fractured prosecution derail the course of justice? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the Babri Masjid demolition case, ordering a joint trial of all accused individuals. The core issue was whether
Can a land acquisition be upheld even with procedural errors? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition for a market expansion. The Court acknowledged procedural infirmities but upheld the acquisition, emphasizing the larger public interest. This case highlights the balance between procedural compliance and public benefit in land
Can a cooperative society chairman be disqualified for actions deemed detrimental to the society? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The court examined the legality of disqualifying a chairman after his removal from office. This case highlights the powers of the Registrar of
