Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order for Lack of Documents: State of U.P. vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (2010)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a disciplinary inquiry is valid if the charged employee is not provided with the necessary documents relied upon in the charge sheet. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha [Judgment Date]: 2nd February 2010 Date of the Judgment: 2nd February 2010 Citation: (2010) INSC […]

Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order for Lack of Documents: State of U.P. vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha (2010) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1977 Murder Case: Ashok Singh vs. State of U.P. (18th September 2009)

Date of the Judgment: 18th September 2009 Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, J. and J.M. Panchal, J. Did the High Court err in upholding the conviction of the accused based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence in a decades-old murder case? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in an appeal stemming from a 1977

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1977 Murder Case: Ashok Singh vs. State of U.P. (18th September 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of arbitrator in construction contract disputes: Asian Techs Ltd. vs. Union of India (2009)

Date of the Judgment: 07th September 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Markandey Katju, J., Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. When disputes arise in construction contracts, can an arbitrator’s decision be challenged if it seems to contradict clauses in the original agreement? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of arbitrator in construction contract disputes: Asian Techs Ltd. vs. Union of India (2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles norms for sanctioning Junior Assistant posts in minority schools: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School (28 August 2009)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28 August 2009 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, R.M. Lodha Imagine a school struggling to get approval for a staff member. Does the government have the final say, even years after the initial request? The Supreme Court of India addressed this very issue in a case involving Amala Annai Higher Secondary School,

Supreme Court settles norms for sanctioning Junior Assistant posts in minority schools: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School (28 August 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on eviction orders during appeals: State of Maharashtra vs. M/s. Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. (27 August 2009)

Date of the Judgment: 27 August 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi, Aftab Alam Can a High Court impose conditions, such as requiring a tenant to pay an amount exceeding the contractual rent, for staying an eviction order during the pendency

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on eviction orders during appeals: State of Maharashtra vs. M/s. Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. (27 August 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits appellant due to non-compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act in milk adulteration case: Mohd. Zafar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2009) INSC 123 (18 August 2009)

Date of the Judgment: 18 August 2009 Citation: Mohd. Zafar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2009) INSC 123 Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, J., Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. In a significant ruling concerning food adulteration laws, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of ensuring fair trial rights to an accused. The case revolves around the alleged

Supreme Court acquits appellant due to non-compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act in milk adulteration case: Mohd. Zafar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2009) INSC 123 (18 August 2009) Read Post »

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28th May 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma, Hon’ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan Can a disciplinary inquiry be sustained on vague charges? The Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. vs. Gyan Chand Chattar

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Housing Board House After Unjustified Exclusion: Umesh Pandey vs. Bihar State Housing Board (2009)

Can a housing board deny allotment of a house based on a minor defect in an affidavit without giving an opportunity to rectify it? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where an applicant was excluded from a housing lottery due to an alleged defect in the submitted affidavit. The Court

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Housing Board House After Unjustified Exclusion: Umesh Pandey vs. Bihar State Housing Board (2009) Read Post »

Essential Commodities Act: Supreme Court clarifies company liability in Essential Commodities Act violations (2009)

Can individuals in charge of a company be prosecuted separately if the company violates the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, even if the company itself isn’t prosecuted? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in an appeal concerning alleged violations of the Act related to misdeclaration of fiber compositions in textiles. Justices Arijit Pasayat and

Essential Commodities Act: Supreme Court clarifies company liability in Essential Commodities Act violations (2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Attempt to Murder Conviction in Gruesome Assault Case: State of M.P. vs. Kashiram & Ors. (2009)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the act of chopping off a person’s leg constitutes an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of M.P. vs. Kashiram & Ors. Judgment Date: 2nd February 2009 Date of the Judgment: 2nd February 2009 Citation: 2009 INSC 191 Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Attempt to Murder Conviction in Gruesome Assault Case: State of M.P. vs. Kashiram & Ors. (2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the protection of retiral benefits from attachment in execution of decree: Radhey Shyam Gupta vs. Punjab National Bank (2008)

Date of the Judgment: 4th November, 2008 Judges: Altamas Kabir, J., Markandey Katju, J. The Supreme Court addressed the question of whether retiral benefits, specifically pension and gratuity, can be attached for the satisfaction of a court decree, even after these benefits have been converted into fixed deposits. This appeal arose from a case where

Supreme Court settles the protection of retiral benefits from attachment in execution of decree: Radhey Shyam Gupta vs. Punjab National Bank (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top