Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Search Procedure: Man Bahadur vs. State of H.P. (23 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question: Is it mandatory for an investigating officer to inform an accused of their right to be searched in the presence of a Magistrate or a gazetted officer, as per Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances […]

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Search Procedure: Man Bahadur vs. State of H.P. (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Election Commission’s Symbol Order: Subramanian Swamy vs. Election Commission of India (23 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Case: Subramanian Swamy v. Election Commission of India Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar Can a political party perpetually retain a reserved election symbol, even after losing its recognized status? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court Upholds Election Commission’s Symbol Order: Subramanian Swamy vs. Election Commission of India (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Rule 2(a) of Customs Tariff Act in Sony India Ltd. Case (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8236 of 2002 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan, Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar The Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether imported components of Colour Television (CTV) sets should be treated as complete CTV sets for the purpose of assessment under

Supreme Court clarifies Rule 2(a) of Customs Tariff Act in Sony India Ltd. Case (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Re-Deployment Policy for Retrenched Employees in Labour Law: K. Alex vs. Delhi State Mineral Dev. Corpn. (23 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5797 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 14337 of 2006) Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can an employer selectively deny re-deployment to a retrenched employee when a company policy mandates it? The Supreme Court of India, in K. Alex

Supreme Court settles Re-Deployment Policy for Retrenched Employees in Labour Law: K. Alex vs. Delhi State Mineral Dev. Corpn. (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Arbitration: M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited vs. Kola Shipping Limited (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. When disputes arise in international commercial agreements, how should courts approach arbitration clauses? This question was addressed by the Supreme Court of India in a case between M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited and Kola Shipping Limited. The core issue revolved

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Arbitration: M/s Shakti Bhog Foods Limited vs. Kola Shipping Limited (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Dalveer Bhandari When can a court set aside a decree against some defendants when only one defendant applies to set aside an ex-parte decree? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the treatment of provision for doubtful debts under Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act in company taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Delhi vs. M/s HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd. (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a key question regarding the Income-tax Act: Can a provision for doubtful debts be added back to a company’s net profit when calculating its tax liability under Section 115JA? This case, Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Delhi vs. M/s HCL Comnet Systems

Supreme Court settles the treatment of provision for doubtful debts under Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act in company taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Delhi vs. M/s HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When can a higher court hear an appeal against a lower court’s decision if the original case involved multiple parts of the Indian Constitution? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in the case of Shahu

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When a complaint alleging fraud and other related offences is filed, what procedure should a Magistrate follow? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji. The core issue

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008)

Okay, I’m ready to continue generating the WordPress blog post based on the provided Supreme Court Judgment. ## Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) “`html Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2008 Case: Doi Wala

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles appointment process for Extra Departmental Branch Post Master: T. Jayakumar vs. A. Gopu (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 22, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. When is a delayed application not really delayed? The Supreme Court addressed the complications arising from a candidate’s omission to sign an application for the position of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master (EDBPM) in Kadambadi village.

Supreme Court settles appointment process for Extra Departmental Branch Post Master: T. Jayakumar vs. A. Gopu (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside reinstatement order in disciplinary proceedings: Union of India vs. Y.S. Sadhu (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 22, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source Text] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. In cases of disciplinary action against employees, can a reinstatement order be upheld if the principles of natural justice were not fully followed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court sets aside reinstatement order in disciplinary proceedings: Union of India vs. Y.S. Sadhu (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top